title: OpenClaw P1 Memory Corpus (2026-04-25 to 2026-05-25) category: references tags: [openclaw, memory, dingtalk, wiki] aliases: [OpenClaw P1 Memory Corpus] relationships:
- target: "entities/openclaw"
type: related_to
- target: "skills/openclaw-memory-governance"
type: derived_from
- target: "skills/openclaw-dingtalk-push-operations"
type: derived_from sources: [_raw/openclaw/p1-memory-2026-05-25/] summary: A curated source record for the first OpenClaw memory ingest batch: MEMORY.md plus 42 recent daily and session memory files. provenance: extracted: 0.9 inferred: 0.08 ambiguous: 0.02 base_confidence: 0.88 lifecycle: draft lifecycle_changed: 2026-05-25 tier: supporting created: 2026-05-25T08:35:00Z updated: 2026-05-25T08:35:00Z
OpenClaw P1 Memory Corpus (2026-04-25 to 2026-05-25)
This source batch captures the highest-signal local OpenClaw memory material currently available in the vault: one curated long-term memory file and 42 recent daily/session memory files preserved under _raw/openclaw/p1-memory-2026-05-25/.
Scope
workspace/MEMORY.mdis the durable memory backbone for user preferences, stable rules, current priorities, and confirmed business context.memory/*.mdin this batch covers the most recent 30 days, including daily notes, task-oriented memory fragments, and some session-summary files.- The batch contains both high-signal operational knowledge and noise such as heartbeat checks, repeated hourly success logs, and NO_REPLY-style traces.
Extracted Themes
- The OpenClaw environment is being used as a long-running operational assistant rather than a one-off chat tool.
- DingTalk is a primary delivery surface for scheduled pushes, alerts, and operational interaction.
- Memory governance is explicit: long-term facts go into
MEMORY.md, short-term developments go into daily notes, and session isolation is treated as a hard rule. - Wiki usage is shifting toward raw-first preservation and later distillation, not direct summarization from external paths.
- OpenClaw is tightly coupled to business support work around U8, delivery planning, procurement tracking, and internal tooling.
Filtering Notes
- Repeated heartbeat-only files were archived but treated as low-value evidence.
- Repeated hourly token-push success lines were kept as evidence of automation maturity, not as separate knowledge items.
- Session-summary files were used mainly to detect emerging themes such as proxy handling, MCP usage, wiki setup, and worklog habits.
Representative Raw Sources
_raw/openclaw/p1-memory-2026-05-25/workspace/MEMORY.md_raw/openclaw/p1-memory-2026-05-25/memory/2026-04-28.md_raw/openclaw/p1-memory-2026-05-25/memory/2026-04-29.md_raw/openclaw/p1-memory-2026-05-25/memory/2026-04-30.md_raw/openclaw/p1-memory-2026-05-25/memory/2026-05-11-dingtalk-mcp.md_raw/openclaw/p1-memory-2026-05-25/memory/2026-05-14-1537.md_raw/openclaw/p1-memory-2026-05-25/memory/2026-05-25.md
Open Questions
- The batch already shows a split between durable operational knowledge and high-volume delivery telemetry; future ingest passes should likely separate those streams. ^[inferred]
- Some business-domain notes in the daily memory files belong more naturally to U8- or Jixinde-specific pages than to OpenClaw system pages. ^[inferred]